Keyword summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Girls On The Run results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 746 hits . Analysis detected 1,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (26,771 of 54,528 keywords). This Girls On The Run is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Girls On The Run
Keyword details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst