Keyword summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gilman District results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 597 hits . Analysis detected 2,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,658 of 36,180 keywords). This Gilman District is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Gilman District
Keyword details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst