Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These German Defense results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,060 of 36,408 keywords). This German Defense is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
German Defense
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
48%German Defense (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos