Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Representative results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 1,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,788 of 37,536 keywords). This Georgia Representative is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Georgia Representative
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Georgia Representative (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.6% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.0%13.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos