Keyword summary
45%2 analyzed articles/videos213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Elections results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 3,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,732 of 34,832 keywords). This Georgia Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Georgia Elections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
55%Georgia Elections (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos