Keyword summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Elections results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 547 hits . Analysis detected 3,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (15,732 of 34,832 keywords). This Georgia Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Georgia Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 3,616
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst