Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Election Probe results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,978 of 37,536 keywords). This Georgia Election Probe is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Georgia Election Probe
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Georgia Election Probe (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos