Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genius Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,127 hits . Analysis detected 9,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,878 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,108 of 37,536 keywords). This Genius Act is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Genius Act
Keyword details
Total words: 7,878
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst