Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genetic Mutations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 3,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,460 of 37,536 keywords). This Genetic Mutations is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Genetic Mutations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%Genetic Mutations (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos