Keyword summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genetic Diversity results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 339 hits . Analysis detected 2,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (20,434 of 35,721 keywords). This Genetic Diversity is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Genetic Diversity
Keyword details
Total words: 3,548
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst