Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generational Divide results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 1,030 hits. Analysis detected 6,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,705 of 35,666 keywords). This Generational Divide is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Generational Divide
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Generational Divide (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.1%29.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos