Keyword summary
82% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaza Strip results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 6,318 hits . Analysis detected 39,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,063 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,305 of 34,426 keywords). This Gaza Strip is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Gaza Strip
Keyword details
Total words: 39,063
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles39.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst