Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gate Money results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 2,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,177 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,160 of 37,536 keywords). This Gate Money is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Gate Money
Keyword details
Total words: 1,177
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 23.4% 23.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 25.6% 25.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst