Keyword summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Peters results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 697 hits . Analysis detected 5,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,528 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,406 of 35,668 keywords). This Gary Peters is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Gary Peters
Keyword details
Total words: 5,528
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst