Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garry Tan results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,326 hits . Analysis detected 10,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,806 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,402 of 35,718 keywords). This Garry Tan is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Garry Tan
Keyword details
Total words: 9,806
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst