Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Game 4 Knicks Spurs 3 1 Nba Finals results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 1,820 hits. Analysis detected 7,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Game 4 Knicks Spurs 3 1 Nba Finals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Game 4 Knicks Spurs 3 1 Nba Finals
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.7%30.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos