Keyword summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Costs results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 10,234 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,541 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,776 of 37,536 keywords). This Fuel Costs is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Fuel Costs
Keyword details
Total words: 11,541
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst