Keyword summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frontier results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,081 hits . Analysis detected 12,942 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (32,284 of 35,713 keywords). This Frontier is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Frontier
Keyword details
Total words: 17,776
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst