Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frisco Texas results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 2,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (29,674 of 36,754 keywords). This Frisco Texas is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Frisco Texas
Keyword details
Total words: 4,108
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst