Keyword summary
62%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frida Adame results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,571 of 34,832 keywords). This Frida Adame is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Frida Adame
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
61%Frida Adame (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos