Keyword summary
53%2 analyzed articles/videos6,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freshwater Mussels results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,735 hits. Analysis detected 14,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,605 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,618 of 37,304 keywords). This Freshwater Mussels is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Freshwater Mussels
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
10%Freshwater Mussels (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 19,605
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos