Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These French Open results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,892 hits . Analysis detected 11,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,408 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (33,013 of 37,536 keywords). This French Open is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. French Open
Keyword details
Total words: 16,408
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst