Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Freeway Cap results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 389 hits . Analysis detected 2,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 49,222 keywords). This Freeway Cap is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Freeway Cap
Keyword details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst