Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fraud Investigation results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,423 hits . Analysis detected 16,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,234 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,082 of 35,635 keywords). This Fraud Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Fraud Investigation
Keyword details
Total words: 8,234
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst