Keyword summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Franchise Agreement results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 511 hits . Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (40,121 of 59,653 keywords). This Franchise Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Franchise Agreement
Keyword details
Total words: 4,640
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst