Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francesco I De Medici results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 1,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,777 of 37,536 keywords). This Francesco I De Medici is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Francesco I De Medici
Keyword details
Total words: 1,808
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst