Keyword summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fram2 Mission results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (27,457 of 35,774 keywords). This Fram2 Mission is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Fram2 Mission
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠24%Fram2 Mission (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos