Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox Friends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 4,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,317 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,677 of 35,635 keywords). This Fox Friends is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. Fox Friends
Keyword details
Total words: 1,317
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.3% percentile 10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 47.7% 47.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 37.3% 37.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 40.1% 40.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 47.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 40.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 37.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Red Herring: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 0.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst