Keyword summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuel Industry results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 922 hits . Analysis detected 9,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,457 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,495 of 37,536 keywords). This Fossil Fuel Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Fossil Fuel Industry
Keyword details
Total words: 6,457
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst