Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forever Chemicals results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,590 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,145 of 37,536 keywords). This Forever Chemicals is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Forever Chemicals
Keyword details
Total words: 3,590
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst