Keyword summary
69% 2 analyzed articles/videos 650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forest Management results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 911 hits . Analysis detected 8,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,345 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,984 of 36,715 keywords). This Forest Management is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Forest Management
Keyword details
Total words: 5,345
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst