Keyword summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Surrogacy Ban results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (11,975 of 37,533 keywords). This Foreign Surrogacy Ban is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Foreign Surrogacy Ban
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠69%Foreign Surrogacy Ban (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos