Keyword summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foodnet results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 372 hits . Analysis detected 2,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,620 of 35,718 keywords). This Foodnet is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Foodnet
Keyword details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst