Keyword summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos5,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Waste results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,688 hits. Analysis detected 20,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,836 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (25,435 of 37,530 keywords). This Food Waste is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Food Waste
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠33%Food Waste (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,836
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos