Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Tracking results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,761 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Tracking is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Food Tracking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Food Tracking (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos