Keyword summary
81%1 analyzed article/video1,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Emancipation results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 4,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,605 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,017 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Emancipation is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Food Emancipation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
47%Food Emancipation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,605
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos