Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Banks results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 7,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,676 of 37,536 keywords). This Food Banks is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Food Banks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Food Banks (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.7%5.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos