Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fomc results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 5,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,053 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (33,589 of 34,833 keywords). This Fomc is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Fomc
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
4%Fomc (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,053
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate