Keyword summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Folsom Field results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (55,042 of 56,285 keywords). This Folsom Field is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Folsom Field
Keyword details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst