Keyword summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Focus Group results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 1,620 hits . Analysis detected 11,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,367 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,842 of 37,536 keywords). This Focus Group is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Focus Group
Keyword details
Total words: 5,367
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.5% 26.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst