Keyword summary
â 37% 1 analyzed article/video 825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fish Tumors results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 200 hits . Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,475 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 38% (23,441 of 37,536 keywords). This Fish Tumors is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Fish Tumors
Keyword details
Total words: 2,475
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst