Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fish Tumors results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,475 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (23,441 of 37,536 keywords). This Fish Tumors is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Fish Tumors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠38%Fish Tumors (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,475
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos