Keyword summary
6%1 analyzed article/video2,310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fires In The Night results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 424 hits. Analysis detected 3,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,348 of 37,536 keywords). This Fires In The Night is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Fires In The Night
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
1%Fires In The Night (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos