Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Danger results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 2,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,209 of 37,536 keywords). This Fire Danger is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Fire Danger
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Fire Danger (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate