Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Financialization results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 3,437 hits . Analysis detected 21,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Financialization is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Financialization
Keyword details
Total words: 14,160
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.3% 24.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst