Keyword summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 2,337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Restrictions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 5,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (42,969 of 52,164 keywords). This Financial Restrictions is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Financial Restrictions
Keyword details
Total words: 9,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst