Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finance Ministry results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,704 of 37,536 keywords). This Finance Ministry is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Finance Ministry
Keyword details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst