Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Final Four results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 2,414 hits . Analysis detected 21,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,773 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,378 of 37,536 keywords). This Final Four is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Final Four
Keyword details
Total words: 20,773
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst