Keyword summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video1,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ferran Torres Spain World Cup Final Argentina results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 2,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,645 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,501 of 37,536 keywords). This Ferran Torres Spain World Cup Final Argentina is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Ferran Torres Spain World Cup Final Argentina
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,645
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos