Keyword summary
21%3 analyzed articles/videos1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fergie Chambers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 890 hits. Analysis detected 5,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,578 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,156 of 35,635 keywords). This Fergie Chambers is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Fergie Chambers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
30%Fergie Chambers (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,578
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos