Keyword summary
21% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fergie Chambers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 890 hits . Analysis detected 5,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,578 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,156 of 35,635 keywords). This Fergie Chambers is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Fergie Chambers
Keyword details
Total words: 6,578
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst