Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fences results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,577 keywords). This Fences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fences
Keyword details
Total words: 2,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst