Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Work Visas results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 4,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,160 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Work Visas is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Federal Work Visas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
60%Federal Work Visas (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos